On the REAL ID Act
May. 9th, 2005 01:59 pmeveryone. Various communist countries
implemented a primitive form of this sort of
thing and as such it has always been
conceptually associated as a tool for government
opression.
There are a number of people that claim that
Bush is a closet nazi or some such, though, I'm
willing to accept that he's not a nazi but
rather simply a clueless man that listens to
clueless advisors about superficial solutions to
poorly posed problems. Albeit, I do understand
that Bush was the favored mainstream candidate
amongst domestic neo-nazis, but I'm sure that's
a matter of he being as far right a candidate as
was available.
That's not to say that Bush and his advisors
don't have some level of dogmatic similarity
with the third reich. There are parts of the US
Patriot act that read VERY similarly to soviet
and nazi-era laws with regard to surveillance
and arrest powers (particularly compared to
pre-existing US law). And, of course the Bush
administration's public chastisement of anti-war
protestors with "You are either with us, or with
the terrorists," and the accompanying rallying
of the public to support the war in Iraq was
eerily reminiscent of Hermann Goering's (Nazi
Luftwaffe-Chief) sentiment:
"Of course the people don't want war. But after
all, it's the leaders of the country who
determine the policy, and it's always a simple
matter to drag the people along whether it's a
democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice
or no voice, the people can always be brought to
the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All
you have to do is tell them they are being
attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of
patriotism, and exposing the country to greater
danger."