![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Originally published at Twixel.net. You can comment here or there.
So tell me folks -
What in the hell is wrong with this? -
–
ARTICLE
SECTION 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
SECTION 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.
–
I’m baffled by the opposition. Mind blowingly baffled.
Granted - Two years is too long to wait for taking effect - but still… come on!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 09:48 pm (UTC)The realities of history, incidentally, have shown that the U.S. has generally staggered in the direction of personal freedom. To recognize that is not sexist.
Humanity in general has also staggered in the direction of tolerance and freedom.
Either way, there is no sexism involved. I might as well call YOU sexist for insisting that women need special legislation to retain their equality. If one were reading into things, one might think that you were taking the position that men are, as a rule, tyrannical. THAT would be sexist. Believing in the human race? Not so much.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 10:31 pm (UTC)And damn if I didn't recognize the 14th amendment - I was looking at that and thinking "that's already in there somewhere isn't it?"
It actually crossed my mind that you might be doing that - but I was too lazy to go look.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 10:39 pm (UTC)I cheat; I have a pocket Constitution w/ amendments.