Date: 2007-09-15 04:44 am (UTC)
Hah! I got it all figured out. Remember the X-Prize suborbital hop? Going fully orbital takes 40 times the energy, right? We could lift *huge* payloads if we didn't have to make orbit.

So drop a tether from geostationary orbit to 100 miles above the surface of the Earth. Then start shipping stuff up there. You'd think our lifting capacity would jump by a factor of 40, but it's actually much better than that because most of what we're lifting that high right now is fuel.

So, what? Maybe a hundred-fold decrease in Earth-to-LEO cost? Just hop in a suborbital ship that wanders up 100 miles, then hook onto the bottom of the ladder, and climb.

You avoid having to connect the beanstalk to the earth, you avoid weather, you make the whole thing a lot lighter (because a lot of the weight comes from having to support that bottom piece), and if you go high enough you can avoid space junk slicing the beanstalk to ribbons.

Yeah, the beanstalk will fall slowly... so mount an ion drive or hall thruster or solar sail on it so it can slowly boost itself higher and higher.

It's probably still unworkable without nanotubes, but hey! A hybrid approach? Someone should write a paper. *hint, hint* :)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

August 2023

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6 789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 09:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios