![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
http://www.reason.com/rb/rb081106.shtml
....
Even if terrorists were able to pull off one attack per year on the scale ofthe 9/11 atrocity, that would mean your one-year risk would be one in 100,000 and your lifetime risk would be about one in 1300. (300,000,000 ÷3,000 = 100,000 ÷ 78 years = 1282) In other words, your risk of dying in a plausible terrorist attack is much lower than your risk of dying in a car accident, by walking across the street, by drowning, in a fire, by falling,or by being murdered.
....
Right -freaking- on.
....
Even if terrorists were able to pull off one attack per year on the scale ofthe 9/11 atrocity, that would mean your one-year risk would be one in 100,000 and your lifetime risk would be about one in 1300. (300,000,000 ÷3,000 = 100,000 ÷ 78 years = 1282) In other words, your risk of dying in a plausible terrorist attack is much lower than your risk of dying in a car accident, by walking across the street, by drowning, in a fire, by falling,or by being murdered.
....
Right -freaking- on.
Right again!
Date: 2006-08-12 08:27 am (UTC)Re: Right again!
Date: 2006-08-17 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 12:40 pm (UTC)Now cars, lots of people die in cars. Why does nobody seem afraid of cars?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 05:10 pm (UTC)